ABSTRACT:

Several researchers have studied the impact of reservoir depletion on rock mechanical behavior and associated changes in in-situ stresses and reservoir depletion stress path. However, the evolution of the reservoir stress path (ratio of change in minimum horizontal stress with reservoir pressure change) due to re-inflation of the reservoir during injection operations such as waterflooding is less understood.

In this work, a more fundamental approach to the evolution of the reservoir stress path under both depletion and re-inflation is studied through core plug uniaxial-strain experiments and field-scale numerical modeling which includes the impact of plastic deformation. Both unconsolidated and consolidated sandstones are considered. Results from the uniaxial-strain compaction experiments agree with findings from 3-D field scale numerical modeling that the injection stress path coefficient γh,i = ΔσhPinj is either similar or greater than the depletion stress path coefficient γh,d = ΔσhPdep.

The findings in this study have significant implications for waterflooding operations, infill drilling window estimation for re-inflated reservoirs, and CO2 capture and storage operations (CCS). The assumptions on γh,i directly impact the allowable injection pressure, injection rate, and storage capacity for CCS projects. Hence a more thorough understanding could prevent overly conservative designs and promote a more accurate screening of potential waterflooding, infill drilling, and CCS projects.

1. INTRODUCTION

The reservoir minimum horizontal stress path is the ratio of change in total minimum horizontal stress, Δσh to change in reservoir pressure, ΔP:

(equation)

It is crucial to understand the anticipated minimum horizontal stress changes in a reservoir during long-term production and during injection operations such as waterflooding because σh is closely related to hydraulic fracturing in a normal stress environment. When describing the reduction in σh from depletion, the stress path coefficient is defined as γh,d. When describing the increase in σh from re-inflation, the stress path coefficient is defined as γh,i. The Δ's in these definitions are defined to always give positive values of γh,d or γh,i. The assumptions on γh,i (injection stress path coefficient) could impact the allowable injection pressure, injection rate, and storage capacity for waterflooding & CCS projects and a more thorough understanding could prevent overly conservative designs.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.