ABSTRACT

As for any novel technology, the need to consider, identify and formulate performance requirements and related assessment criteria has been an important subject in the development of Wave Energy Converters (WECs). These allow the characterisation of each technology through techno-economic indicators, which in turn allow comparisons between different technologies, and an assessment of alternative solutions throughout all the development stages.

Such assessment is ideally carried out through the application of metrics, which should comply with several attributes, such as being objective, quantitative, specific, measurable, repeatable, and independent.

In the present work, more than 50 metrics to monitor the development of WECs are compiled, explained, and discussed. These metrics are divided in the following evaluation areas: 1) Performance; 2) Reliability; 3) Survivability; 4) Techno-economics. In addition, the important evaluation area of Environmental Impact is briefly discussed concerning the need for common metrics.

The compilation summarised in this paper and its discussion aim to provide a practical reference source concerning metrics for WEC development, which is currently unavailable in the published literature in terms of broadness and condensed presentation. Such compilation includes multiple formulations from the wave energy sector and other relatable industries (e.g. wind energy) that are typically diluted among specialist literature, standards, guidelines and recommendations, scientific papers, and project reports. The paper is concluded with a reflection of any salient gaps that are not addressed by current metrics, in a context of accelerating the development of WEC technologies.

INTRODUCTION

The assessment of performance requirements and related criteria allow to characterise Wave Energy Converters (WECs) through techno-economic indicators. These provide a base set for comparing different technologies and enable assessing the goodness of the solutions and its components throughout all the development stages. This assessment is ideally carried out through the application of metrics, which should comply with the following attributes (Weber et al., 2019):

• Objective — Quantitative — Specific — Measurable.

• Certain — Precise — Repeatable — Transparent.

• Straightforward — Simple — Meaningful — Correct.

• Complete, capturing all relevant aspects.

• Balanced, reflecting the impact of diverse criteria.

• Interconnected, reflecting all relevant trade-offs.

• Independent, no need for subject matter experts.

• Ease of description, low effort in providing the system description as the basis for the assessment.

• Ease of use, low effort assessment process.

• Fast, short duration of assessment process.

• Cheap, low-cost assessment process.

• Supported, existing empirical and theoretical tools.

• Characterizing, capturing qualitative features of additional system performance information.

• Flexible, applicable at all development stages.

• Universal, applicable across systems levels, archetypes.

• Equitable, providing comparability across different technologies, archetypes, domains.

• Established, globally recognized.

This content is only available via PDF.
You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.