An accurate prediction of elastic parameters is crucial for predicting minimum horizontal stress in wellbore stability, drilling design of horizontal borehole azimuth and hydraulic fracturing in petroleum engineering. For a transversely isotropic shale formation, the vertical and horizontal mechanical properties can be obtained from five independent elastic stiffnesses C11, C33, C44, C66 and C13, which also are the necessary parameters for horizontal stresses estimation. Among these stiffness coefficients, C33 and C44 can be obtained from the P- and S-wave velocities while C66 is calculated from the Stoneley wave velocity if there is. The other two elastic stiffness C11 and C13 have to be obtained from the empirical model, such as ANNIE model, M-ANNIE model, M-ANNIE2 model and V-reg model. However, the adaptability and accuracy of the above models to a formation are very different from each other, which need optimization analysis for a specific formation. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the discreteness of stiffness coefficients of the above four empirical models by applying datasets of the ultrasonic velocities of Wufeng–Longmaxi shale of the Sichuan Basin in China, for finding a suitable model of this shale formation for predicting horizontal stress. These four models are divided into two types by whether or not there is Stoneley wave in model, which is group 1 including ANNIE model and M-ANNIE model with Stoneley wave, and group 2 including M-ANNIE2 and V-reg model which lack for Stoneley wave. The results show that the elastic parameters obtained from M-ANNIE model has the smallest deviation with the measured results in group 1. While the elastic parameters calculated by V-reg model makes lower deviation compared to M-ANNIE2 in group 2. But for both groups, the goodness-of-fit of V-reg model is better than other models. Finally, the two models M-ANNIE2 and V-reg are used to a field log example missing Stoneley wave. The results of minimum horizontal stress show that the average error between calculated solution from V-reg model and measured values is less than 10%, which can reflects the actual formation more accurately and exhibit good application potential for drilling and fracturing.
Skip Nav Destination
Analysing a Suitable Elastic Geomechanical Model for Horizontal Stresses Estimation in Transversely Isotropic Shale Reservoir
Lichun Jia;
Lichun Jia
Drilling & Production Technology Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited
Search for other works by this author on:
Dengyun Lu;
Dengyun Lu
Drilling & Production Technology Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited
Search for other works by this author on:
Hu Deng;
Hu Deng
Drilling & Production Technology Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited
Search for other works by this author on:
Zhilin Li;
Zhilin Li
Drilling & Production Technology Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiao Wei;
Xiao Wei
Drilling & Production Technology Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited
Search for other works by this author on:
Xiaocong Cai
Xiaocong Cai
Drilling & Production Technology Research Institute, CNPC Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited
Search for other works by this author on:
Paper presented at the International Geomechanics Symposium, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 2022.
Paper Number:
ARMA-IGS-2022-058
Published:
November 07 2022
Citation
Jia, Lichun, Lu, Dengyun, Deng, Hu, Li, Zhilin, Wei, Xiao, and Xiaocong Cai. "Analysing a Suitable Elastic Geomechanical Model for Horizontal Stresses Estimation in Transversely Isotropic Shale Reservoir." Paper presented at the International Geomechanics Symposium, Abu Dhabi, UAE, November 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.56952/IGS-2022-058
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Personal Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your username and password and try again.
Captcha Validation Error. Please try again.
Pay-Per-View Access
$20.00
Advertisement
31
Views
Advertisement
Suggested Reading
Advertisement